phd supervisor feedback

Providing effective feedback to postgraduate research students is often a challenge for supervisors. Poor feedback leads to a negative supervisory experience for postgraduate research students (Cekiso et al. 2019).

Our analysis demonstrates the centrality of feedback enactments to PhD supervision. Feedback practices built good supervisory relationships and vice versa. Feedback supported candidates coming to know the tacit knowledge practices of the discipline.

Re-read written feedback and meet with your supervisor to discuss it with them. Ask them for advice and seek out resources from the library or online – including our PhD Knowledge Base – so that you understand what is expected of you.

This qualitative framework synthesis of 86 papers analysed rich qualitative data about feedback within PhD supervision. Our synthesis, informed by sociomateriality and a dialogic, sense-making view of feedback, underscores the critical role that feedback plays in doctoral supervision.

Feedback is a complex socio-cultural construct, utilising various modalities over the lifespan of a research candidature. This study reports findings from a review of global literature on...

What is the advice for students to handle critical feedback from supervisors? As one delves into the field of research, it is axiomatic that one is still a novice. On this path, it is beyond doubt that critical feedback hits, and at times, it hits hard. How should one handle this? Asked by Sekgololo Johannes on 24 Aug, 2019. Answer.

Lorraine Hope explains how to mitigate student anxiety and avoid toxic competition with a person-centred approach to supervision. Advice for PhD supervisors on setting out clear expectations and strategies for delivering effective feedback to their doctoral students.

Your supervisor is always saying, “Send me the draft, I’m happy to look at your work, I’d love to see it”, and you’re like, “It’s not ready yet! Let me twiddle with it for another six months or until you stop asking me about it!”. You’ve got to stop doing this because it’s holding you back.

Having a supervision team allows for multiple research strengths to be brought together, but also requires a more thoughtful and open discussion of priorities of the PhD and supervision style (e.g., how hands-on, meeting frequency, and methods of feedback).

With your supervisor being an expert in their field, he should be able to review your work and identify any issues or areas for improvement. Gaining feedback on your work is critical through all stages of your PhD. Initially, feedback will be imperative to ensure you’re staying on track.